Industry stats Updated Sep 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +2.3% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 40.7% of all sites · 58.9% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Wix 4.2% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Joomla 1.1% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 No CMS detected 30.9% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025 Deal Automattic → WebHosting.com domain · Automattic acquired the WebHosting.com domain in July 2026. No public press release or purchase price disclosed; domain now resolves to a 'coming soon' page with Automattic branding. No hosting business or customer migration was included in the deal. 2026 Industry stats Updated Sep 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +2.3% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 40.7% of all sites · 58.9% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Wix 4.2% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Joomla 1.1% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 No CMS detected 30.9% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025 Deal Automattic → WebHosting.com domain · Automattic acquired the WebHosting.com domain in July 2026. No public press release or purchase price disclosed; domain now resolves to a 'coming soon' page with Automattic branding. No hosting business or customer migration was included in the deal. 2026
SaaS AI Tools DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean launches agent runtime with idle-time billing pause

New service targets cost of AI agents waiting on external responses

DigitalOcean launches agent runtime with idle-time billing pause
Kris Møklebust · Pexels

DigitalOcean has released a new runtime platform designed to address a persistent inefficiency in AI agent deployment: billing for idle time. The service, called DigitalOcean Managed Agents, isolates each agent in its own environment, controls access to external tools, and optimizes inference speed. The primary selling point is not enhanced intelligence but reduced operational costs at scale.

The platform targets a specific pain point for developers running AI agents in production. Traditional cloud infrastructure continues to charge for compute resources even when agents are waiting for responses from models or external tools. DigitalOcean’s solution pauses billing during these idle periods, resuming charges only when the agent actively processes tasks. The company claims its runtimes can resume from a paused state in 305 milliseconds, a 46% improvement over competing offerings. Internal testing suggests this approach can cut total costs by up to 37% compared to a leading sandbox competitor.

How the platform works

DigitalOcean Managed Agents provides isolated runtimes for each AI agent, ensuring secure execution of untrusted code. The platform also maintains context across sessions, which can be long and unpredictable, and supports rapid pausing and resuming of agents. This capability is critical for agents that spend significant time waiting for external responses, such as API calls or model outputs. By eliminating charges during these idle periods, the platform aims to make AI agent deployment more cost-effective for businesses.

The service is currently in public preview, with early adopters already testing it in production environments. Qencode, a company specializing in support automation, has built a triage agent on the platform that processes incoming requests from Slack, email, and Intercom. The agent automatically routes tickets, saving the team an estimated four to eight hours per week. Other companies, including OpenHands and Amplitude, are also developing agent workflows on the platform.

Background

Background: AI agents are software programs that perform tasks autonomously, often requiring interaction with external tools, APIs, or machine learning models. These agents frequently experience idle periods while waiting for responses, during which traditional cloud infrastructure continues to incur costs. DigitalOcean’s new platform addresses this inefficiency by pausing billing during these idle states.

Industry implications

DigitalOcean’s move reflects a broader shift in cloud infrastructure priorities. As AI agents become more integral to business operations, the need for specialized runtime environments grows. The company compares this evolution to the early days of cloud computing, when virtual machines became the default foundation for online services. However, AI agents require more than raw compute power—they need secure execution environments, context persistence, and infrastructure capable of rapid state transitions.

The financial impact of idle-time billing has been a long-standing frustration for developers. By addressing this issue, DigitalOcean is positioning itself as a cost-effective alternative to competitors that continue to charge for unused compute resources. Whether this model will become an industry standard remains uncertain, but the company is betting that the biggest hidden cost of running AI agents is not the computation itself but the waiting.

What to watch

The success of DigitalOcean Managed Agents will depend on adoption rates and cost savings realized by early users. If the platform delivers on its promise of reducing expenses by up to 37%, it could pressure competitors to adopt similar billing models. Developers and businesses will likely monitor the performance and reliability of the service, particularly its ability to handle complex workflows and maintain security. The public preview phase will be critical in determining whether the platform can scale effectively and meet the needs of production environments.

Companies mentioned

DigitalOcean Amplitude OpenHands Qencode

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.