Original reporting
Articles synthesise from monitored industry feeds and primary source material. We do not publish rewritten copy from other news outlets. Writers paraphrase aggressively — changing sentence structure, not swapping a few words — and state only facts present in the consulted sources.
Source requirements
Facts must be traceable to sources consulted during the pipeline run. If sources conflict, the article says so. We do not invent numbers, quotes, names, or dates. Verbatim quotes appear only when they exist word-for-word in source material and are attributed to the named person and outlet.
Independent verification
Every draft passes an independent editor validation stage before publication. A pass clears the article for publishing; a fail allows one revision attempt, after which the piece is rejected.
Transparency by default
Each published article includes a transparency record: source feeds consulted, stages the draft passed through, and validation results. Nothing is summarised away on the public site. If you want to know how a specific claim was sourced, open the pipeline details on that article page.
For the full pipeline overview, see How we work.
Corrections policy
Errors are corrected promptly when brought to our attention. Material changes update the article body and the updated_at timestamp shown on the article page. To report a correction, see Contact.
What we do not do
- No sponsored content disguised as news
- No pay-for-play coverage
- No anonymous single-source claims on material facts
- No aggregation or rewriting of other outlets' reporting