Industry stats Updated Sep 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +2.3% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 40.7% of all sites · 58.9% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Wix 4.2% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Joomla 1.1% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 No CMS detected 30.9% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025 Deal Automattic → WebHosting.com domain · Automattic acquired the WebHosting.com domain in July 2026. No public press release or purchase price disclosed; domain now resolves to a 'coming soon' page with Automattic branding. No hosting business or customer migration was included in the deal. 2026 Industry stats Updated Sep 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +2.3% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 40.7% of all sites · 58.9% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Wix 4.2% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Joomla 1.1% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 No CMS detected 30.9% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Sep 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025 Deal Automattic → WebHosting.com domain · Automattic acquired the WebHosting.com domain in July 2026. No public press release or purchase price disclosed; domain now resolves to a 'coming soon' page with Automattic branding. No hosting business or customer migration was included in the deal. 2026
Cloud & Infrastructure Hyperscalers Microsoft

Microsoft blocks new Azure SQL Data Sync deployments ahead of 2027 shutdown

Existing users retain access until September 2027 as migration planning accelerates

Microsoft blocks new Azure SQL Data Sync deployments ahead of 2027 shutdown
Kris Møklebust · Pexels

Microsoft has begun the final phase of retiring Azure SQL Data Sync, a database synchronization service that enabled hybrid and geographically distributed SQL deployments. As of September 9, the company has blocked new deployments in any Azure subscription that has never used the service, while allowing existing users to continue managing sync groups until the service’s full retirement on September 30, 2027.

The service, which operated on a hub-and-spoke model, allowed an Azure SQL database to act as a central hub for synchronizing data with other Azure SQL or on-premises SQL Server databases. A conflict resolution policy determined whether the hub or member database took precedence during data clashes. While Microsoft did not provide a detailed technical rationale for the retirement, it cited evolving "operational, security, and compliance requirements" as the driving factors behind the decision.

Migration timeline and alternatives

Microsoft first announced the retirement two years ago, but the recent restriction on new deployments adds urgency for customers who have not yet begun transitioning. Existing users have just over a year to migrate to alternative solutions before the service is fully decommissioned. Those without a migration plan will need to act before the September 2027 cutoff to avoid disruptions in their synchronization workflows.

Microsoft has suggested several potential replacements, including Azure Data Factory, Azure Functions, read replicas, linked servers, database mirroring, availability groups, and transactional replication. However, the company acknowledged that "there is no single replacement that maps to every SQL Data Sync configuration," meaning customers will need to evaluate multiple options based on their specific use cases. Hybrid environments and geographically distributed applications, which were key scenarios for SQL Data Sync, may require particularly careful planning to ensure seamless transitions.

For professionals

For professionals: Teams relying on SQL Data Sync for hybrid or multi-region database synchronization should audit their current configurations and begin testing alternative solutions. Migration timelines should account for potential differences in conflict resolution, latency, and scalability among the recommended replacements.

Impact on existing and prospective users

The restriction on new deployments affects only those Azure subscriptions that have never used SQL Data Sync. Subscriptions with prior usage can continue creating, modifying, and managing sync groups and member databases until the retirement date. This phased approach allows existing users to maintain their workflows while preventing new customers from adopting a service that will soon be unavailable.

For organizations considering SQL Data Sync for the first time, the block on new deployments eliminates the option entirely. These customers will need to evaluate Microsoft’s suggested alternatives or third-party solutions to achieve similar functionality. The lack of a direct replacement means that some use cases may require combining multiple tools or rearchitecting parts of their database infrastructure.

Microsoft’s decision reflects a broader trend among hyperscalers to retire legacy services in favor of newer, more integrated offerings. While the company has not disclosed specific security or compliance concerns related to SQL Data Sync, the retirement aligns with its focus on consolidating services to reduce operational complexity and improve long-term maintainability.

What to watch

Customers currently using SQL Data Sync should monitor Microsoft’s official migration guidance, as the company may release additional tools or documentation to assist with the transition. Those relying on hybrid or multi-region synchronization should prioritize testing alternative solutions to identify potential gaps in functionality or performance. Organizations with complex configurations may need to allocate additional time for migration, particularly if their workflows depend on features not fully replicated by Microsoft’s suggested alternatives.

Companies mentioned

Microsoft

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.