Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025Industry stats Updated Jun 2026All domains worldwide 392.5M registered names +6.5% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net total 176.1M names in zone Verisign · Q1 2026.com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026WordPress 41.5% of all sites · 59.3% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Shopify 5.2% of all sites · 7.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Webflow 0.9% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026No CMS detected 30% of all sites W3Techs · 17 Jun 2026Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTDFortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARCFortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCInc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARCDeal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). 2025Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue (Hg-backed) acquired Loopia Group (Nordics) in 2025. 2025Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Perwyn-backed Miss Group acquired Web4U s.r.o. (Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider) in 2025. This is Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership. 2025Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired Webglobe (Slovakia/Czechia/Serbia) in 2025. 2025Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com (formerly World Host Group) acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025, rebranding A2 Hosting under the hosting.com name. 2025
Security Vulnerabilities

Over 400 AUR Packages Weaponized to Deliver Rootkit and Credential-Stealing Malware

A coordinated campaign has embedded a malicious npm package into hundreds of Arch User Repository packages, deploying an eBPF-based rootkit and infostealer targeting developer credentials and secrets.

Over 400 AUR Packages Weaponized to Deliver Rootkit and Credential-Stealing Malware
Sora Shimazaki · Pexels

A coordinated supply-chain attack has compromised more than 400 packages in the Arch User Repository (AUR), using two distinct delivery techniques to drop credential-stealing malware with optional kernel-level rootkit functionality onto developer machines.

Background

Background: The AUR is a community-maintained collection of build scripts that lets Arch Linux users install software outside the distribution's official, vetted repositories. Because packages can change hands without formal review, the platform has historically been a target for malicious actors willing to exploit the trust users place in established package names.

According to researchers at the open-source intelligence group Independent Federated Intelligence Network (IFIN), a new maintainer has been impersonating a well-known AUR publisher to inject malicious pre-install scripts into packages. Those scripts reach out to npm and pull down a package called atomic-lockfile during installation.

Separately, supply-chain security firm Sonatype documented a related but mechanically different method: the same attacker claimed ownership of at least 20 orphaned AUR packages and altered their PKGBUILD scripts — the Bash-based build definitions Arch uses — to invoke npm post-install and fetch atomic-lockfile.

Both paths lead to the same payload. Independent security researcher Whanos analyzed a sample of atomic-lockfile and identified a Linux ELF binary called deps inside it.

"It is designed for developer workstations and build environments. It targets browser and Electron application data, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord, GitHub, npm, Vault, Docker/Podman, SSH, VPN material, shell histories, and other local developer secrets." — Whanos, via IFIN report

Sonatype's analysis corroborated the scope: the binary can collect GitHub credentials, SSH artifacts, HashiCorp Vault tokens, browser cookie databases, and data from Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, and Telegram. It also supports archiving collected data, splitting it into multi-part files, and exfiltrating it over HTTP — a complete exfiltration pipeline in a single binary.

The eBPF component raises the severity considerably. When running with root privileges, it can conceal processes, files, and network interfaces inside the kernel, making detection with standard tooling unreliable and complicating post-incident cleanup.

For professionals

For professionals: Any Arch-based build server, CI runner, or developer workstation that installed AUR packages recently should be treated as potentially compromised. Credential rotation for all targeted services — GitHub tokens, SSH keys, Vault secrets, and browser-stored passwords — is the minimum response. Because the rootkit can survive standard removal attempts, affected systems should be rebuilt from a clean image rather than remediated in place.

AUR maintainers are actively working to identify and remove malicious commits and ban associated accounts. Arch Linux package maintainer Jonathan Grotelüschen has called on community members to report any suspicious packages they encounter. IFIN member Michael Taggart has published a script that checks a running system for atomic-lockfile artifacts, and a list of affected packages with indicators of compromise is available in the Whanos report.

The incident illustrates the compounding risk of community repositories that lack mandatory code review: package ownership transfers are a low-friction vector for injecting malware into the supply chains of organizations that depend on AUR for niche tooling, proprietary drivers, or pre-release software versions. Teams that automate AUR installs in CI pipelines without auditing PKGBUILD changes are particularly exposed.

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.