Industry stats Updated Aug 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +6.4% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 41.2% of all sites · 59.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.6% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 No CMS detected 30.4% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025 Industry stats Updated Aug 2026 All domains worldwide 401.6M registered names +6.4% YoY Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net total 179.1M names in zone Verisign · Q2 2026 .com + .net 11.5M newly registered · 76.3% renewed Verisign · Q1 2026 Country-code TLDs 146.3M names +2.4% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 New gTLDs 49.6M names · 30.9% renewed +3.7% QoQ Verisign · Q1 2026 Legacy gTLDs 20.5M names · 67.6% renewed +14.6% YoY Verisign · Q1 2026 WordPress 41.2% of all sites · 59.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Shopify 5.3% of all sites · 7.6% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Wix 4.3% of all sites · 6.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Squarespace 2.5% of all sites · 3.5% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Joomla 1.2% of all sites · 1.7% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Webflow 0.8% of all sites · 1.2% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Drupal 0.7% of all sites · 1.1% of CMS sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 No CMS detected 30.4% of all sites W3Techs · 1 Aug 2026 Nginx on 33%–39% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 Apache on 24%–29% of sites W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 LiteSpeed gaining share among web servers W3Techs · Mar–Apr 2026 DMARC adoption 937.9K valid records +79% in 3 yrs EasyDMARC · 2026 YTD Fortune 500 95% publish DMARC · 80% enforced EasyDMARC Fortune 500 62.7% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Inc. 5000 15.2% use strict reject policy EasyDMARC Deal CVC Capital Partners → Namecheap · CVC Capital Partners acquired a majority stake in Namecheap in September 2025, valuing the company at ~$1.5B (including debt). Namecheap reported $398M in revenue for 2024, an 18% year-on-year increase. 2025 Deal team.blue (Hg-backed) → Loopia Group · team.blue acquired Loopia Group in May 2025, expanding its customer base from 2.5M to over 3M entrepreneurs across Europe. Loopia Group operates in Sweden, Finland, Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, and Serbia, with 320 professionals and ~650,000 customers. 2025 Deal Miss Group (Perwyn-backed) → Web4U s.r.o. · Miss Group acquired Web4U, a Prague-based web hosting and domain registration provider, in 2025. This marked Miss Group’s 14th acquisition under Perwyn ownership and its 22nd acquisition since 2018. Web4U serves 15,000+ customers and reported CZK 38M in revenue for 2021. 2025 Deal group.one → Webglobe · group.one acquired 100% of Webglobe in May 2025, a leading hosting provider in Slovakia, Czechia, and Serbia. Webglobe manages ~300,000 registered domains and registers ~10% of national domains in its core markets. 2025 Deal hosting.com → FastComet, A2 Hosting · hosting.com acquired FastComet in April 2025 and A2 Hosting in January 2025. FastComet serves 32,000 clients across 100 countries, and A2 Hosting was rebranded under the hosting.com name in April 2025, including a $2M purchase of the hosting.com domain. 2025
Business Funding Starcloud

Starcloud secures $250M for orbital AI data centers

Orbital startup raises funds to scale satellite-based AI compute infrastructure

Starcloud secures $250M for orbital AI data centers
Kris Møklebust · Pexels

An orbital data center startup has secured fresh capital to advance its plan of deploying high-performance computing infrastructure in space. The funding reflects growing investor interest in alternative AI infrastructure, even as technical and economic hurdles persist for off-planet operations.

Funding and strategic backing

Starcloud has raised $250 million in a Series A extension round, bringing its total funding to $450 million. The investment values the company at $2.3 billion post-money and was led by Manhattan West, with participation from existing backers such as Benchmark, EQT, and Soma. New investors include NVIDIA, Cisco Investments, and Cedar Capital. The capital will be used to expand spacecraft manufacturing, secure launch capacity, and deepen engineering collaboration with NVIDIA.

The involvement of NVIDIA and Cisco signals strategic interest in adapting computing and networking hardware for space environments. NVIDIA’s role focuses on developing radiation-tolerant accelerators, while Cisco’s expertise in networking could address data transfer challenges between orbital and terrestrial infrastructure. However, the funding does not resolve fundamental questions about the viability of space-based compute at scale.

Technical milestones and challenges

Starcloud has demonstrated AI workloads in orbit, including training models and running inference on an NVIDIA H100 GPU aboard its Starcloud-1 satellite, launched in late 2025. The company has also tested a version of Google’s Gemini AI in space. These achievements confirm that AI hardware can function in orbit, but they do not address whether such infrastructure can compete with terrestrial data centers on cost, reliability, or serviceability.

Operating in space introduces unique constraints. Hardware failures cannot be repaired on-site, radiation exposure requires specialized designs, and heat dissipation relies on radiators rather than traditional cooling systems. Launch availability and replacement cycles add further complexity to capacity planning. Starcloud’s long-term vision includes deploying 88,000 satellites and 20 gigawatts of orbital compute capacity, a scale that would rival major terrestrial data center buildouts but requires industrialized manufacturing and launch cadence.

Background

Background: Orbital data centers aim to leverage solar power and radiative cooling to bypass terrestrial constraints like land availability and energy supply. However, space-based infrastructure faces challenges in hardware durability, network latency, and regulatory compliance, particularly around data sovereignty and debris mitigation.

Economic and regulatory hurdles

The economics of orbital compute remain unproven. While falling launch costs could improve feasibility, Starcloud has not disclosed details on when space-based AI workloads might achieve cost parity with terrestrial alternatives. The company’s manufacturing expansion—including a 100,000-square-foot facility in Washington—highlights the shift from demonstration hardware to industrial-scale production. However, producing thousands of satellites requires supply chain assurance and launch frequency that few computing companies have managed.

Regulatory and legal questions also loom. Spectrum rights, launch licensing, debris mitigation, and data sovereignty could complicate deployment. Workloads in orbit remain subject to the legal frameworks of the countries they serve, despite their physical location above national borders. Enterprises may hesitate to adopt orbital infrastructure without clear service guarantees, security controls, and dependable connectivity.

What to watch

Investors and industry observers will focus on several key indicators of progress. Manufacturing throughput, launch commitments, and spacecraft reliability will reveal whether Starcloud can transition from technical demonstrations to repeatable infrastructure. Early customer workloads and partnerships will signal market demand, while advancements in radiation-tolerant hardware and networking could address some of the current limitations. For now, orbital AI data centers remain an ambitious experiment rather than a proven alternative to terrestrial cloud regions.

Companies mentioned

Starcloud Cisco Google Manhattan West NVIDIA

Discussion · coming soon

Be the first to join the thread when community discussion launches.